| Home | Products | About Us | Contact Us | Our Foundation | Our Other Companies | Pay Invoice |
|
Social Security Books
Bohr's
Social Security Issues Medical Issues in Social Security Disability $129 Social Security Advisory Service $149 Social Security Disability Advocate's Handbook $119
Social
Security Disability Medical Social Security Disability Practice $149
99 Free Articles,
All new articles are Social Security
Disability NEW Alternate Sitting and Standing Questions for the VE Attacking the Vocational Expert’s Testimony on the Number of Jobs Classifying a Claimant’s Previous Work Experience as Past Relevant Work Cross-Examination on U.S. Publishing Data Cross-Examination of Vocational Expert on Census Data Dealing with Drug Addiction or Alcoholism in Social Security Disability Claims Framework of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines Hearing Questions on Physical Residual Functional Capacity Information Required to Perform a Step-Four Analysis
NEW
Initial Hearing
Questions for Claimant Maximum Residual Functional Capacity Possible for Disability Finding
NEW
Protect Attorney’s Fees From
Being Taken to Pay Client’s Debts Pushing Back the Date the Claimant Became Disabled NEW Residual Functional Capacity in Musculoskeletal Impairments Social Security Disability Benefits: Answers to Common Questions Transferability of Skills: Principles and Cross Examination Using the Occupational Outlook Handbook in your Cross Examination Civil Litigation Breach of Contract Defense Interrogatories Deposing the Corporate Designee in Health Insurance Denial Case NEW Essential Objections Checklist Fraud and Misrepresentation Interrogatories Interrogatories: Breach of Contract NEW Interrogatories: Interference with Business Relations Interrogatories for Proving Plaintiff’s Cause of Action in an Auto Accident Case Preparing to Take or Defend a Liability Deposition Summarizing Personal Injury Damages Wrongful Death Interrogatories California Civil Litigation NEW Elements with Complaint: Breach of Contract for Failure to Perform NEW Elements: Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing NEW Objecting to Expert Testimony Criminal Law and
Practice Challenging Written Statements Cross-Examination of Eyewitnesses Federal Criminal Practice Pretrial Release on Conditions Drunk Driving
NEW
4 DUI Jury
Instructions You Need to Argue Attacking Field Sobriety Tests Attacking Widmark Calculations Cross Examination in Drunk Driving Cases
NEW
DUI Trial Tips Pattern Openings for DUI Attorneys Selecting a Favorable DUI Jury Voir Dire Questions for DUI Lawyers
Informal Request for Discovery from Prosecution Motions to Exclude Chemical Test
Tipsters and Employment Defending Plaintiff's Deposition NEW Deposing the HR Manager in RIF Cases Deposing the Supervisor/Harasser NEW Document Requests in Sexual Harassment
NEW
Fair Labor
Standards Act Jury Instructions Fee Arrangements, with Clauses Shaping the Unripe Employment Cases NEW Supervisor Deposition Questions for Harassment, Retaliation, and ADA Estate Planning
and Advantages and Disadvantages of QTIP Trusts Client Intake, with Retainer Agreement Drafting for Incapacity, with 4 Clauses Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust, with Provision International Asset Protection Trust IRS Reporting and International Asset Protection Trusts Protecting Beneficiaries with Spendthrift Clauses Risks and Abuses with Foreign Trusts Shifting Trusts and Disclaimers, with Four Sample Clauses Family Personal Injury NEW 3 Motions in Limine to Exclude Junk Accident Reconstruction Science Cross-Examining the Defense Orthopedic Surgeon Debunking Claims of Exaggeration and Malingering Deposing and Examining the Economist Deposing the DME in Spine Injuries Deposing the Store Manager in a Slip and Fall Case
|
Attacking the Vocational Expert’s Testimony Social security lawyers should ask for specific page and edition citations, and get copies of the resources used by the VE into the record. by David F. Traver Excerpted from Social Security Disability Advocate’s Handbook
The Social Security Administration uses the sequential evaluation process to evaluate disability claims. At step five of the sequential evaluation process, the SSA often uses a vocational expert. When the VE gets to the part of the testimony about “specific jobs” and especially “numbers of jobs” the VE may start making everything up. This is a sad fact, given that in 1999, government payments to VEs totaled $21.6 million to 1,337 VEs. Memorandum from Inspector General, SSA to Acting Commissioner Larry Massanari, Aug. 21, 2001. This is the endpoint of most of the testimony at
disability hearings, and it is the most critical. Do not walk away from the
hearing with thousands of unchallenged jobs on the table unless you have a
strategy in place, such as attacking the jobs in a post-hearing memorandum to
the ALJ and the record has been left open for that purpose. §1902.1 Do Not Let the
VE Give Only the Bottom Line The essence of an attack on the VE’s testimony at the
hearing is insistence on understanding how the VE knows what the VE says he or
she knows. Don’t settle for the allegation that “25-years experience”
gives the VE an intuitive grasp that there are 12,432 unskilled, one-armed,
illiterate, sedentary inspectors locally or nationally. The null hypothesis starts with the assumption that
the VE has no idea what the quantities of the alleged jobs might be, if any.
It puts the burden on the VE to convince you of the reliability of the testimony.
Work in your cross-examination to determine if the VE actually has a reliable
data source and methodology, and that the VE has properly applied established
vocational principles and methods to the facts of the case. §1902.1.1 Get the Same
Information the VE Has at the Hearing Do not let the VE give only the bottom line. If the
VE rattles off 1, 2, or 20 alleged resources (such as the often improperly used
United States Publishing Unskilled Quarterly Reports or Census Reports),
get exact copies of those alleged resources into the record. See
Chapter 15 Other Sources of Vocational Data. Ask the VE to put the relevant pages, including the cover
pages, into the record or buy those resources and submit them to the
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). Insist the VE be specific on the record
about which edition of which report he or she used and the page number relied
upon for the information to make sure you have the right documents. If
“census codes” are used, get them into the record. If “DOT codes” are
used, get those into the record also. §1902.1.2 Get the Same
Information the VE Has at the Hearing – Sample Letter I was at a hearing and a VE testified his numbers came
from the Wisconsin Career Information System. He had the allegedly
relevant book with him at the hearing, and I asked him to turn to the page which
supported his testimony, and give us the page number, and to repeat it so I was
certain there would be no misunderstanding. I then asked for the name,
publisher, and date of publication. I asked the ALJ to leave the record open, purchased the
book, and then discovered (no surprise here) that the VE made up the answer out
of thin air. I asked the judge to allow me to listen to the hearing tape to make
sure my notes were accurate, and they were. The VE had simply fabricated an
answer. I filed a timely objection to the ALJ, and the case was paid. Download the Sample Letter in Microsoft Word.
Leave the record open, study the resources, and figure out
what the alleged sources have to offer. If you are not convinced by the
VE’s data source and alleged methodology, be sure to object on the record to
bring the problem to the attention of the ALJ.
David F. Traver has represented hundreds of claimants at SSA and over 200 claimants in U.S. District Courts. He has bachelor and master degrees in vocational rehabilitation, and is the author of Social Security Disability Advocate’s Handbook, from which this article is excerpted. |
Updated 11/10/09