|
Countering defense claims of exaggerated pain.
by
Dorothy Clay Sims
Excerpted from
Exposing Deceptive Defense
Doctors
Q: Doctor,
can you tell me if you had any formal classes in medical school devoted
solely to treatment of pain? [This is extremely rare in
U.S.
medical schools.[i]
Most doctors have had no formal training in understanding pain.]
Q: What is
the name of the class?
Q: And
certainly there is a transcript confirming this?
Q: Doctor,
have you taken the examination for pain management approved by the
American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS)?
Q: Do you
even know what I am talking about?
Q: Are you a
member of the American Board of Pain Medicine (ABPM)?
Q: Doctor,
are you board certified by the American Board of Medical Specialties
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation subspecialty in Pain management?
Q: Are you
board certified in Pain Management by the American Academy
of Experts in Traumatic Stress?
Q: How about
the subspecialty of Pain Management for the American Society of
Anesthesiologists?
Q: Are you
board certified in Pain Management by the American Board of Medical
Specialties?
Q: Are you
board certified in Pain Management by the
American
Academy of Pain
Management?
Q: Doctor,
are you board certified in pain management at all?
Q: Doctor,
have you ever published any articles on [lumbar] pain in any peer review
journals?
Assuming the doctor is board certified in something:
Q: Doctor,
did you pass the test on the first try? [This is a sensitive issue
with defense doctors because they may have flunked the first time, but
won’t volunteer this information.]
§18:12 Case Preparation,
Research
Q: Doctor,
are you familiar with the International Association for the Study of
Pain, otherwise known as the IASP?[ii]
Q: Are you
familiar with the IASP Task Force on Taxonomy publication,
Classification of Chronic Pain?[iii]
Q: Do you
know who sits on the Task Force?
Q: Are you
aware that the IASP Task Force is l2 years old?
Q: Are you
aware that l3 countries are represented on this Task Force?
Q: Are you
aware the Task Force consists of over l00 internationally known and
respected doctors who got together and created a book containing
descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms?
Q: The Task
Force was responsible for the development and widespread adoption of
universally accepted definitions of terms and a classification of pain
syndromes, correct?
Q: Have you
looked up my client’s condition in the Classification of Chronic Pain?
Q: So you
have not even researched the international standards for classifying
pain?
Q: Doctor,
show me any articles/journals you reviewed in preparation for this
lawsuit.
Q: Have you
done a meta-analysis on treatment of [your client’s condition, e.g.,
chronic pain or herniated discs with radiating pain] with the
symptoms/findings in this case?
Q: Doctor,
you would agree that prior to rendering an opinion on this topic, it is
important to stay current in the science and literature?
Q: You would
also agree that it would be unethical to research and copy only those
articles supporting the defense position right?
Q: Doctor,
you mentioned earlier, when I showed you my research, that there are
articles on just about everything that take one side or another on an
issue, correct?
Q: That
being the case, show me where you found articles that supported the
plaintiff’s side?
Q: Doctor, I
have dozens of articles supporting our position and it looks like you
only have research that support’s your position. Why did you ignore the
articles supporting the plaintiff?
Q: Doctor,
can you show me any articles you’ve researched on this condition?
Q: What? You
haven’t researched this at all?
Q: Doctor,
aren’t they paying you $___ per hour with no cap?
Q: You make
more money in forensics [than in your clinical practice], right?
Q: So it
would help you, economically, if you took the time to verify your
opinions with cold hard facts, wouldn't it? That is, of course, unless
the science doesn't back you up, right?
Q: So,
doctor, just to sum up: I believe you’ve testified that (a) you have had
no specific classes in the treatment of pain; (b) you have not published
on this topic; and (c) you are not board certified in the treatment of
pain. Is that right?
§18:13 Basic Medical
Knowledge of Pain
Q: Doctor,
where in the body is pain generated?
Q: Where are
the pain signals transmitted?
Q: Where is
pain perceived in the brain?
Q: What
chemicals are involved in that process and how are they involved?
Q: What is
the difference in where acute pain is perceived in the brain as opposed
to chronic pain? [Acute pain is perceived in the sensory cortex;
chronic pain is perceived in the sensory cortex and frontal lobes. When
frontal lobes are involved, there is more emotional dysfunction, i.e.
depression.]
Q: What are
the functions of the following pain-related structures in the brain and
how do they work?
-
The deep layers of the superior colliculus?
-
The red nucleus?
-
The pretectal nuclei (anterior and posterior)?
-
The nucleus of Darkschewitsch?
-
The interstitial nucleus of Cajal?
-
The intercolliculus nucleus, nucleus cuneiformis
and even the Edinger-Westphal nucleus?
-
The periaqueductal grey matter (PAG)?
Q: Are you
aware of the increased incidents of depression due to pain?
[iv]
Q: Pain can
interfere with sleep, which can make the pain worse, right?
Q: Pain can
disrupt concentration and memory, correct?[v]
Q: Do you
agree pain can decrease brain volume?
Q: In other
words, chronic [back] pain can actually cause the brain to shrink,
right?[vi]
Q: Do you
agree pain can cause other problems, including stress-related hormones
promoting tissue breakdown, energy mobilization, and cardiovascular
responses like tachycardia, hypertension, ischemia and ventricular
arrhythmias, immune impairment?[vii]
Q: Doctor,
are you aware of the research indicating that the combination of
depression and pain makes treatment even more difficult?[viii]
Q: Are you
aware of research indicating that stress and pain leave patients more
susceptible to infection and complications?[ix]
Q: Pain can
even kill, can’t it, doctor?[x]
[Related to accelerated tumor growth]
Q: Isn’t it
true that pain is now considered to be the 5th vital sign?
Q: And isn’t
it also true that the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations and the Department of Health and Human Services have begun
to include pain control criteria alongside other criteria for
accreditation and reimbursement?[xi]
§18:14 Knowledge of Pain as Related to Client’s
Condition
Let's say your client has a herniated disc on the right
side and is complaining of pain on his left side. Most defense doctors
will claim your client is a fraud. The following questions help to
expose the DME’s lack of knowledge of the basic anatomy of pain, as it
relates to the client’s specific condition. You can use this technique
and similar questions to expose the DME’s ignorance of your own client’s
pain condition.
Q: Doctor,
are you aware of studies that clearly show that a nerve injury on one
side of the nerve (in rats) actually resulted in contralateral
neuropathic pain – that is, pain on the opposite side?[xii]
Q: Did you
know that hemilateral nerve injuries in rats were found to cause
contralateral mechanical allodynia induced by the hemilateral spinal
nerve, which was associated with upregulation of satellite cells and
TNFa in the contralateral DRG?
Q: Are you
aware that additional research suggests that spinal astrocytes also
played a part in these changes on the opposite side of the lesion?
Q: Doctor,
do you even know what TNFa is?
Q: How does
the upregulation of satellite cells occur?
Q: How do
spinal astrocytes play a part in this pain reaction?
Q: Can we
assume you would not take the position that the rats are
malingering?
§18:15 Exaggerated Pain
Q: Doctor,
did you have my client complete a pain diagram?
Q: Doctor,
do you disagree that the pain diagram is consistent with a known
dermatomal pattern on an L4-5 disc?
Q: What is
my client’s pain level? [The DME didn’t check.]
Q: Did you
use any pain scales? [No.]
Q: What is
the normal pain level for this condition? [He won’t know. You can
find out by checking the DME’s subspecialty website. See Chapter 3,
Appendix 3-B, List of Medical Websites. These websites provide
invaluable information on various conditions.]
Q: So you
don’t know my client’s pain level or the normal pain level for this
condition, but you claim my client is exaggerating his pain?
Q: Please
identify each and every behavior that you believe is an example of this
alleged “exaggeration” or “exaggerated pain response.”
Q: Please
identify each and every statement my client made which represents
“exaggeration” or “exaggerated pain response.”
Q: What
exact symptom is my client malingering? [The DME typically
won’t have an answer. Defense doctors wish to paint a broad picture of a
malingering plaintiff, without filling in the details. See generally
Chapter x: Malingering.]
Q: Doctor,
do you agree individuals can feel pain differently?
Q: Are you
aware of studies that were done wherein all the individuals were given
the same exact painful stimulus, and fMRIs of the brain revealed they
actually experienced the pain differently?
Q:
Therefore, you cannot say my client is exaggerating his pain complaints,
can you?[xiv]
Q: Are you
saying my client is lying when he says he hurts? [Make sure
your client is present via phone at the deposition. Advise the doctor of
this prior to the deposition and provide notice to the defense attorney.]
Q: Are you saying it is
anatomically impossible for this condition to cause pain?
Q: Why did you
think it was more important to spend your valuable time listening to my
client’s lung sounds, which were not relevant to this case, instead of
documenting the level, type, and consistency of my client’s pain before
you claimed he was not honest?
§18:16 Treatment with Narcotics
If the DME claims the treating
doctor gave too many narcotics or the wrong narcotics ask:
Q: Doctor,
the treating doctor prescribed ______. Can you tell me when the
peak time is for that medication? (i.e., how long after ingestion
before the medication is at its maximum benefit)
Q: Can you
tell me the half-life of the medication prescribed by the treater?
Q: Doctor,
if you can’t tell me the peak time or half-life of the medication, that
means you don’t know:
-
How long it takes before the medication starts to
help the patient after he takes it; or
-
How many hours the medication is typically
beneficial.
If you can’t even tell me this
basic information about the medication that was prescribed, please
explain how you have the expertise to testify that it is the wrong
medication.
Q:
Doctor, some people have highly efficient livers, such that they
metabolize or breakdown a medication and flush it from their system
faster than other individuals, right?
Q:
Before accusing the treating doctor of over-medicating the
patient, don’t you think it might be a good idea to see if the patient’s
body is metabolizing the medication (flushing it out of his system) at a
rate that makes the treating doctor’s suggested frequency of narcotic
appropriate?
Q:
You would do that by clinical correlation, which is to say, by asking
the patient if the frequency is such that it makes his pain manageable,
correct?
Q: Many
different factors can play a part in metabolism of medication, correct?
Q: Show me
where you factored that into your equation before you accused my
client’s treating doctor of overmedicating.
Q: Doctor,
overmedicating someone can be medical malpractice, can’t it? [Most
doctors are afraid to accuse other doctors of malpractice, due to fear
of retribution if the claim is unscientific. However, a few
doctors still go too far. If the doctor claims it is malpractice, ask
him if he has reported the treater to the board of medicine like he is
supposed to do if he is aware of a doctor committing malpractice.]
Q: What are
the signs of overmedication you can document? [respiratory depression,
hypotension, lethargy/sedation. Be careful not to confuse
lethargy/sedation with depression. If the DME points to lethargy and/or
sedation, ask how he was able to differentiate narcotics as the cause,
as opposed to depression.]Q:
What objective factors can you document?
Q: What
subjective factors?
Q: If the
patient is still having pain, then it is likely the treater may actually
need to increase the dose, right?
If the doctor recommends no narcotics for pain
treatment:
DMEs may do this because it reduces the defense cost in
a life-care plan or, perhaps, to paint the plaintiff as a drug addict to
the jury, thus increasing the likelihood of a defense verdict. Ask the
DME:
Q: Doctor,
you testified that my client should not have narcotics because it could
cause him to become addicted, correct?
Q: Can you
show me where there is evidence that my client met the “high risk”
definitions, as set forth by the American Academy of Pain Medicine?
Q: Do you
even know what they are?
Q: Let me
show you:
1. First they require active substance abuse.[xv]
Can you show me evidence of this?
2. Ok, how about a major untreated
psychological disorder — did you find evidence of this in your report
and diagnose my client or refer him out?[xvi]
3. Show me specific evidence of the criteria
that involves “significant risk to self and practitioner.”[xvii]
Q: Let’s
take a look at the definition of “low risk”[xviii]
for addiction to narcotics which includes:
1. No past/current history of substance abuse.
2. Noncontributory family history of substance
abuse.
3. No major or untreated psychological
disorder.
Doctor, can you identify a single example of a past
or current history of substance abuse?
Q: How about
a family history of substance abuse?
Q: Can you
show me an example of an untreated psychological disorder? [If not,
then the doctor must admit, at least according to the only published
definition of risks of addiction on the table, that your client is in
the low-risk category.]
Q: Doctor,
are you familiar with [look at your article so he knows you have the
science behind you) the published statistics which indicate the
actual addiction rate of individuals given narcotics?
Q: Are you
aware the actual “addiction” rate of narcotics is only 2-5%?[xix]
Q: You
indicate that you are concerned about the plaintiff so you recommend
discontinuing his narcotics. Is that right?
Q: So, even
if the medication helps him, and the odds are 95-98% likely he won’t
become addicted, you still want to take away his medicine?
Q: Doctor,
does that mean you consider my client to have a doctor/patient
relationship with you? [Many doctors will deny this to avoid
liability in the event anyone actually relies on their opinion.]
Q: So, let
me see if I understand your testimony:
1. You agree my client’s symptoms decreased with
narcotics.
2. You agree he has a condition known to cause
pain.
3. You agree you are not his doctor and he is
not your patient.
Yet, you still claim here, under oath, that you have
the ability to take away his medications? [That is the essence of his
testimony.]
Q: Doctor,
do you normally make medical recommendations for individuals who are
not your patients?
Q: Doctor,
isn’t it true that the real reason you claim this man is not your
patient is to avoid liability if you commit malpractice?
Q: Doctor, I
understand you recommend no narcotics for the treatment of pain, is that
right?
Q: Are you
familiar with the “patient rights and organizational ethics” as set
forth by the Joint Commission Standards on Pain?[xx]
Q: Now,
let’s see:
1. You have no formal training in pain
management;
2. You have not published on this subject and
have done no research for this case; and
3. You are suggesting this plaintiff has
had NO narcotics, even though he is functioning and working and driving.
Is that correct?
Q: Where did
you admit this in your report?
Q: So, you
would admit that if you take away my client’s narcotics, it can decrease
his level of function, right?
Q: Do you
think that is kind, doctor, or the right thing to do -- to demand that
someone stop taking medicine that is actually helping him?
Q: Are you
willing to be considered a treating physician if doctors follow your
advice, such that you would be subject to potential malpractice claims?
I mean, how deep does this feeling run?
Q: Doctor,
do you really think you are in a better position to suggest my client
stop his narcotics even though you’ve never treated him and, as you’ve
said, he’s not your patient?
Q: Doctor,
you seem to criticize the plaintiff’s physician for prescribing pain
medication, is that right?
Q: Are you
familiar with the journal Pain?[xxi]
Q: Are you
familiar with the research showing not only do opioids/narcotics
decrease pain, they also increase function?[xxii]
Q: Are you
familiar with the standards for the use of controlled substances for
treatment of pain as set forth by Agency for Health Care Administration
and Florida Pain Commission, Florida Board of Medicine and Florida Board
of Osteopathic Medicine?[xxiii]
[Do some quick research for similar publications in your state.]
Q: You are
governed by the State Board of Medicine, right?
Q: Are you
aware that the Florida Board of Medicine maintains that “inadequate pain
control may result from physicians’ lack of knowledge about pain
management or an inadequate understanding of addiction.”[xxiv]
Q: Doctor,
have you researched whether physicians, like yourself, who have not
formally studied or taken specific classes for pain management may
undertreat their patients with chronic pain?
Q: Pain can
certainly increase the probability of developing a psychiatric
condition, especially depression, right?
Q:
Depression can be fatal, can’t it?
Q: Doctor,
isn’t it true that pain is often undertreated in many populations of
patients?
Q: Isn’t
undertreatment of pain just as much of a problem as overtreatment?’[xxv]
Q: So, let
me see if I understand this:
1. My client has pain.
2. His treating doctor prescribed narcotics.
3. The narcotics help reduce the pain.
4. He’s not your patient; and you only saw him
one time and not in the capacity of a doctor/patient relationship,
correct?
And you still claim he should not be given narcotics?
Q: Even
though they help his pain?
Q: Have you
considered increased limitations and decreased function if his pain is
not under control?
Q: Have you
considered the potential for increased depression due to increased pain
if he does not have the ability to take pain medications?
Q: Have you
considered the potentially devastating effects of difficulty sleeping
that can occur when his pain is out of control?
Q: Is this
how you would treat your own patient? A patient who has a condition that
is known to generate pain; he has taken a medication that helps the
pain; and you would tell that patient, “Sorry, I know the medicine helps
but I’m not going to prescribe it to you”?
For additional discussion and sample questions re
narcotics, see Chapter 17: Spine, §17:16.
§18:17 Causation
These questions assume your client has pain from a
herniated disc after a car accident. Use this same technique to pin the
DME down regarding the facts of your case.
Q: Doctor, a
car accident can cause a herniated disc, right?
Q: Herniated
discs can cause pain, right?
Q: Doctor,
where in the records is it documented that my client had pain of this
type, location, and severity before the crash?
Q: So my
client has been alive for [e.g., 20,000] days, and could have had
back pain on any one of those days, right?
Q: And it
just so happens, with 1-out-of-20,000 odds of developing painful
symptoms, my client spontaneously developed these symptoms after
a car crash which, you admit, could cause the symptoms, but
didn’t, and you don’t know what else did. Is that right?
Q: Can what
event in my client’s life was statistically more likely to cause this
pain, other than the crash?
Dorothy
Clay Sims has perhaps the most unusual legal practice in the nation.
She helps lawyers cross-examine doctors in cases involving personal
injury, long-term disability, medical malpractice, criminal law, family
law, and workers’ compensation. In her 25 years as a lawyer, Ms.
Sims has cross-examined thousands of doctors throughout the U.S. In addition to
cross-examining doctors herself, Ms. Sims provides notebooks for lawyers
to use in examining doctors which include background material on the
expert as well as questions to use in deposition and trial.
Ms. Sims is senior partner of Sims &
Stakenborg in Gainesville
and Ocala, Florida, where her firm practices social
security disability law and assists lawyers in understanding medical
issues. Ms. Sims is the author of
Exposing Deceptive Defense
Doctors, from which this article is excerpted.
[i] Paradise,
LA
and PP Raj, “Competency and Certification of Pain Physicians,”
Pain Practice, 4.3 (Sept 2004): 235.
[ii] International Association for the
Study of Pain (IASP), 2006, The International Association
for the Study of Pain, 14 Dec 2006.
www.iasp-pain.org/
[iii] Task Force on Taxonomy, Classification of
Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and
Definitions of Pain Terms, 2nd Edition, Eds. Harold Merskey
and Nikolai Bogduk, Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1994.
[iv] “Depression following spinal cord
injury. A clinical practice guideline for primary care
physicians,” Washington,
D.C.:
Paralyzed Veterans of America (1998), National Guideline
Clearinghouse,
29 Jan 2007, <http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=1677&nbr=000903&string=depression+AND+following+AND+spinal+AND+cord>.
[v] For a good discussion of the relationship
between pain, concentration and memory, see
http://www.pain.com/sections/pain_resources/news/news.cfm?id=649.
This site discusses how pain may disrupt the memory traces
required to retain information.
[vi] Apkarian, AV, et al., “Chronic Back Pain is
Associated with Decreased Prefrontal and Thalamic Gray Matter
Density,” Journal of Neuroscience 24.46 (17
Nov 2004): 10410-10415.
[vii] International Association for the Study
of Pain: Pain Clinical Updates, “Pain Controls: The New
‘Whys’ and ‘Hows’,” Vol. 1, No. 1, Eds. DB Carr, et al., May
1993, 14 Dec 2006
<http://www.iasp-pain.org/
AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=2561>.
[viii] Blair, M, et al., “Depression and
Pain Comorbidity: A Literature Review,” Archives of Internal
Medicine 163.20 (10 Nov 2003): 2441. “[D]ifferent aspects of pain negatively
affect several depression outcomes. Increasing pain severity,
pain that interferes with daily activities, frequent pain
episodes, diffuse pain, and pain that is refractory to
treatment…”
[ix] M. Good, G. Anderson, S. Wotman, J. Albert,
X. Cong, L. Chiang, E. Bernhofer, “Effects Of Relaxation/Music
And Patient Teaching For Pain Management On Salivary Cortisol,”
The Journal of Pain. vol. 9, issue 4 Supp. (April 2008).
[x] International Association for the Study of
Pain: Pain Clinical Updates, “Pain Controls: The New ‘Whys’
and ‘Hows’,” Vol. 1, No. 1, Eds. DB Carr, et al., May 1993, 14
Dec 2006 <http://www.iasp-pain.org/
AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=2561>.
[xi] International Association for the Study of
Pain: Pain Clinical Updates, “Pain Controls: The New ‘Whys’
and ‘Hows’,” Vol. 1, No. 1, Eds. DB Carr, et al., May 1993, 14
Dec 2006 <http://www.iasp-pain.org/
AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=2561>.
[xii] Hatashita, Satoshi, MD, et al.,
“Contralateral Neruopathic Pain And Neuropathology In Dorsal
Root Ganglion And Spinal Cord Following Hemilateral Nerve Injury
In Rats,” Spine, vol. 33: l344- 1355.
[xiii] 10/3/08 http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.tfd.com/dorland/thumbs/dermatome.jpg&imgrefurl=http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Brown%2Bdermatome&h=514&w=250&sz=27&hl=en&start=4&usg=__kuKhrrqNFhHY46gGxR6n0uGkSzU=&tbnid=tiRW35q3nxnkVM:&tbnh=131&tbnw=64&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddermatome%2Bwikipedia%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
[xiv] Coghill, RC, et al., “Neural correlates of
interindividual differences in the subjective experience of
pain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
100.14 (8 July
2003): 8538-8542.
[xv] Fine, Perry,
MD, Fishman, Scott, Optimizing Opioid Therapy for
Chronic Pain: Clinical and Legal Considerations,
American
Academy
of Pain Management, Monograph, released 5/l/08, at 4.
[xix] Fine, Perry,
MD, Fishman, Scott, Optimizing Opioid Therapy for
Chronic Pain: Clinical and Legal Considerations,
American
Academy
of Pain Management, Monograph, released 5/l/08, at page 3.
[xxi] The official publication of the
International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by
IASP, 7 Sept
2007.
http://www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=PAIN_Journal2&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=1766
[xxii] Rashiq, S, et al., “The Effect of
Opioid Analgesia on Exercise Test Performance in Chronic Low
Back Pain”, Pain 106.1-2 (Nov 2003): 119-25.
[xxiii]
Florida
Administrative Code, Chapter 64B8-9.013, p. 343 of 1559, 19 Oct 2003, The Florida Department of
Health, 23
January 2007
[xxiv] Florida Administrative Code, Chapter
64B8-9.013(b), p. 343 of 1559, 19 Oct 2003, The Florida
Department of Health, 23 January 2007.
[xxv] 1-/6 08
http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/05/17/prsa0517.htm.
“the strengthened pain policy encourages boards to view
undertreatment of pain as serious a violation as overtreatment.”
|